Exhibitor and Sponsorship Information is now available for the 2024 NAPCO Conference in August 25-28 in Denver, Colorado.
NAPCO Conference 2024
Exhibitor and Sponsorship Information is now available!
Read more →
Get Involved
NAPCO membership is open to presiding, chief and leadership judges, court executives and others …
Read more →ABA President Mary Smith Letter in Support of Judicial and Court Security
Our courts and judges are under attack. Serious threats against federal judges have doubled since 2021, with 457 serious threats targeting federal judges across the country in 2023. National leaders and private citizens are making false statements and scurrilous accusations against judges for partisan, personal gain. These attacks are no idle matter. Often, they involve threats of physical harm or death — not only to the judges but also to their families and staff.
Continue Reading ABA President Mary Smith Letter in Support of Judicial and Court Security
Retired U.S. Justice Breyer discusses new book in interview with ABA Journal
Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s new book, Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism, came out Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Randy Maniloff, an attorney at White and Williams in Philadelphia and an adjunct professor at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, recently interviewed Justice Breyer about the book.
Continue Reading Retired U.S. Justice Breyer discusses new book in interview with ABA Journal
Legal innovation and generative AI: Lawyers emerging as ‘pilots,’ content creators, and legal designers.
With gen AI, so much of the lawyering that we’re used to doing manually will be easily automated and readily available for our adoption. For many, that’s a scary thought and leads us to wonder if it makes what we do less important or relevant. My perspective is the exact opposite: I see this as a tremendously exciting time in our profession, because the best use of this newly emerging automation stack can free up real time that lawyers use on heavily time-consuming work with lower payof. It releases that time to let us do more creative, tailored, and innovative work that will allow us to ramp up our expertise and craft unique value.
What Were They Thinking?: Musings of a Jury Deliberation Process
I’ve worked at the NCSC for over 30 years with most of my career focused on the topic of jury system management and jury trial procedure. During this time, my perspectives have mostly been informed by the professional views of judges, lawyers, court administrators, and academics. Only occasionally did I interact with actual jurors. At best, I could only imagine myself in their place when thinking about policies and practices that would benefit the institution of trial by jury. This changed this week when, much to my surprise, I was selected as a trial juror in a criminal case in my local court.
Continue Reading What Were They Thinking?: Musings of a Jury Deliberation Process
Where is courtroom technology heading? It’s complicated
Before the pandemic, the extent of courtroom technology was most likely some combination of a VHS/DVD/CD player, an ELMO document and overhead projector, and laptops, notebooks or tablets so lawyers could run PowerPoint, TrialPad or some other presentation program. And that was assuming the courtroom or jurisdiction had the resources or desire to invest in technology. Thanks to COVID-19, courts underwent a major disruption that led to more widespread adoption of technology.
Continue Reading Where is courtroom technology heading? It’s complicated
NAPCO Executive Director Transition Group Meets in Arizona
In early January, 2024, a special NAPCO Ad Hoc Leadership Transition Committee met for two days in Arizona to plan and develop a changeover in executive-level operations of the Association pursuant to the retirement of the organization’s executive director, Gordon Griller.
Continue Reading NAPCO Executive Director Transition Group Meets in Arizona
Israel’s Supreme Court Strikes Back
At any other time it would have provoked a constitutional crisis. For much of 2023 Israelis had taken to the streets to protest against the government’s efforts to weaken the power of judges to overrule the government, a step many saw as an attack on Israel’s democracy. Yet when on January 1st Israel’s highest court struck down the judicial-reform law passed just six months earlier, most Israelis shrugged.