It serves as a reality-based check on human nature
Source: Minneapolis Star and Tribune Newspaper, Editorial Opinion
Date: November 22, 2023
Author: Hon. Bruce Peterson (ret.), Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota
When siblings are bickering, one will sometimes say, “You better stop it, or I’ll tell Mom!” Adults just say, “See you in court!” The sentiment is the same — there is an adult in the room somewhere, someone who will not take sides in ending ﬁghts and righting wrongs.
And so, high on my gratitude list this Thanksgiving is something about which we often complain and usually take for granted — the court system. Courts are the adult in the room.
Of course, courts don’t always get it right. There are bad and biased judges, and the judicial system reﬂects the inequities of race and power that plague the rest of society.
Nonetheless, we depend on that system to tame the haughty and powerful, be it Sam Bankman-Fried or Amazon. We expect the courts to arbitrate our bitterest culture wars. We rely on courts to protect children, cope with crimes, and enforce contracts.
As imperfect as it may be, without our system of justice we would be left adrift to squabble, suﬀer unfairness, seek revenge, and try to ﬁnd refuge in a clan or tribe instead of prospering in an orderly society.
And courts are proving indispensable in protecting democracy. In 2020, 61 judges rejected Donald Trump’s ramshackle challenges to the election. Now his suspicious personal, business, and political conduct is being scrutinized in court. Amid all the politicking, it has been reassuring, even stirring, to watch the four criminal cases and the civil fraud case against him wend their way forward in that methodical, careful, transparent way, with the full due process for him and his co-defendants that is the hallmark of the judicial system.
Courts can play this democracy-shielding role because they are doing something rare — conducting a reasoned search for the truth.
Lying is deadly to democracy, which depends on an informed electorate. But, let’s face it, we are stuck in a pandemic of lying. Even the nation’s leading cable news network, Fox News, had to pay $787 million for its lies about voting machines.
But courts are a no-lie zone. In court a lie under oath is a crime, and lawyers are ethically bound to candor.
We need to recognize that truth is not something that just happens or that we can take for granted. In his book “The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth,” award-winning author Jonathan Rauch describes what he calls the “reality-based community.” This community is the series of sophisticated institutions, governed by norms and ethical standards and staﬀed by professionals, that evolved to gather, test, and distribute information in a search for truth.
Finding truth takes institutions because no single individual is capable of ﬁnding it. We soak up what our tribes tell us. Our minds fasten on to information that supports what our emotions have already decided.
The tedious, expensive, often arcane court procedures underscore how diﬃcult it is to get to the facts. All parties must get a full opportunity to present their version of the truth, using only reliable and nonprejudicial evidence, and to attack the other side’s version. Central to the spirit of the whole enterprise, jurors are told to set aside their passions. Judges explain or write out their decisions, where an unparalleled quality control process subjects them to review by entire groups of appellate judges.
Besides this complex legal system, Rauch points to three other components of the reality-based community. The other three are the networks of scholars and scientists who publish and debate their ideas in peer-reviewed journals, mainstream journalists whose work is fact-checked and edited, and government agencies that gather statistics and conduct research.
What is so alarming is all three of these other truth-generating institutions are in trouble. Attacks by Donald Trump and others who aim to stir up conﬂict, together with the politicization of all spheres of American life, have markedly eroded the credibility of science and academia, the mainstream press and government.
That means we need to be especially vigilant about threats to the court system. The judiciary remains the most trusted branch of government, but its standing has slipped. With good reason. Conﬁrmation of federal judges has become political theater; state judicial elections have become more partisan and public political pressure seems acceptable.
But the biggest threat is that undermining courts is the road to autocracy. In their bestselling book “How Democracies Die,” Harvard’s Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt call it “capturing the referees” — ousting, bribing, or impeaching judges or packing the courts. The highest court in Hungary was expanded from eight to 15; in Venezuela from20 to 32.
More familiar history: Hitler simply purged uncooperative judges, and the Nazis established special courts to handle political oﬀenses.
As if in a bizarrely bad dream, we can see Trump traveling that road. He has said that each of the judges in the cases against him is biased. He has made claims about their family members. He accused one of rubber stamping a Communist plot. He recirculated a “fantasy” that a judge should be placed under citizen’s arrest. Trump attacked Judge James Robart when the judge struck down Trump’s travel ban early in his presidency, and Robart received over 100 death threats.
Human nature has a dark side — selﬁsh, aggressive, crude. We live in an era when our baser instincts too often get free rein. Human nature is hard to change, but one of humanity’s ﬁnest accomplishments has been the creation of institutions to control and channel our darker impulses and create a culture that mirrors our best selves.
For all its shortcomings, the institutions of our beautiful country have made it the freest and most inspiring nation in the world. Protecting these accomplishments starts with appreciating them.
So this Thanksgiving, let’s be grateful that despite all the perils, there is still an adult in the room.
Hon. Bruce Peterson (ret.) was a District Court Judge from 1999 to 2019 in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which includes Minneapolis and its suburbs. From 2006 to 2008 he was the presiding judge of Hennepin County Family Court. From 2008 to 2013 he initiated and presided over Co-Parent Court, oﬀering supportive co-parenting services to low income, unmarried parents establishing paternity. From 2013 to 2016 he presided over the Hennepin County Drug Court and specialized calendars for people who are homeless and women charged with prostitution.
Judge Peterson was a special assistant in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and a partner in the Minneapolis law ﬁrm of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich and Kaufman. He has written and spoken widely on issues of law and public policy. He was the 2013 recipient of the Hennepin County Bar Association Professionalism Award. He holds a B.A. degree from Cornell and a J.D. from Yale Law School.