NAPCO membership is open to presiding, chief and leadership judges, court executives and others …
Read more →Save the Date! NAPCO Conference • Wilmington, Delaware • August 16-19, 2026
Read more →Bold. Innovative. Visionary. At a time when many courts are losing the battle to provide access to justice, especially in low-income communities, the Arizona Supreme Court has brought fresh ideas to bridge the justice gap.
More than 50 state, local and specialty bar associations have joined with the ABA to “defend the rule of law and reject efforts to undermine the courts and the legal profession.” A March 26 statement released by the groups does not mention President Donald Trump, but it follows his punitive attacks on disfavored law firms and calls to impeach judges he perceives as antagonistic.
If you had to choose the one indispensable power of a leader, which would you pick? Would it be probing intelligence? Boundless energy? Or perhaps just being lucky? One ability may not come to mind for many but really should. For if there is a talent that every leader needs to master, it’s the ability to say the same thing over and over and over again without seeming bored.
Many seasoned leaders over the years have looked to studies, writings, and curricula developed by colleges, consultancies and organizational experts to help them improve their skills in leading loosely-coupled, professionally-dominated enterprises such as courts, hospitals, universities, research institutes and think-tanks. Top-down, command-and-control approaches have never proven to be effective or lasting strategies for such organizations.
Over the years, many seasoned presiding judges, court executives and their leadership teams have looked to studies, writings, and curricula developed by colleges, consultancies and experts to help them improve their skills in leading trial courts as loosely-coupled, professionally-dominated organizations. Top down, command and control approaches don’t tend to work very well.
Since the publication of my technical article “My ‘Hallucinating Experience with ChatGPT’”, I have struggled with the extent to which I should or should not be using artificial intelligence (AI) to perform my judicial duties. It seems that other judicial officers have engaged in similar soul-searching.
The question was considered during President Donald Trump’s first term in office: What would happen if his administration ignored a court order? Now, news articles are considering the issue once again, and commentators are using the term “constitutional crisis” to describe worst-case scenarios.
