As litigators begin to incorporate artificial intelligence into their work, some courts are doing the same. A pilot program in Estonia allows litigants in small claims court to submit their disputes to a computer program. Some Brazilian judges regularly use artificial intelligence when drafting decisions. And a virtual judge presides over court proceedings in some parts of China, although human judges make the final decisions. Before American litigators immediately dismiss this trend, or fully embrace it, I offer two benefits and two challenges that this technology may offer to the judiciary.
Get Involved
NAPCO membership is open to presiding, chief and leadership judges, court executives and others …
Read more →

